Pre-Closing Possession

For one reason or another, a Buyer may need to take possession of real estate before a closing. For instance, if there is a "dry-closing" (ie. one where the lender fails to fund but all other parts of the closing are done and the lender's funding should take place shortly thereafter), a Seller may be willing to allow a Buyer to take early possession of real estate. Most attorneys disfavor pre-closing possession. Why? Mostly because of liability concerns. What if the deal fails to close? What if the Buyer discovers a condition in the property that causes the Buyer to decline to close? What if the Buyer burns down the property? What if the Buyer's property moved into the real estate is stolen?

A proper and well thought out pre-closing possession agreement can address some of those concerns. While granting possession only at the time of closing is preferable, sometimes pre-closing possession is necessary.

What happens if, having transferred possession, the property is destroyed? In such as case, the Illinois Uniform Vender and Purchaser Risk Act shall apply. Unless specifically disclaimed or modified, all real estate contracts in Illinois are subject to the Act.

The act provides first that when neither legal title nor possession of the real estate have been transferred, in the case that all or a material portion of the real estate are destroyed without purchaser's fault, the Seller can not enforce the contract against the Buyer.

The act makes provision, however, for pre-closing possession. When either legal title or possession of the real estate has been transferred, in the case that all or a material portion of the real estate are destroyed without Seller's fault, then in such a case, the Buyer is not relieved of the duty to purchase the real estate.

Thus, if a buyer takes pre-closing possession of a property and the real estate burns down, the Buyer is still on the hook to buy the property.

Sheriff Dart Fined for Slow Evictions

Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart who gained fame a few years ago by refusing to enforce evictions is foreclosure cases has been slammed by a Cook County Judge and ordered to pay a landlord $1400 for taking until February 16, 2010 to enforce an eviction order entered on August 24, 2009. That's about a six month wait. The Sheriff's office argues that manpower shortages, eviction backlogs, and a problem with the eviction order caused the delay.

Landlords are often surprised that it takes so long for the Sheriff to enforce an eviction. In my experience, the winter is always worse for evictions. Because of the holiday eviction moratorium and the delays caused by inclement weather, evictions in the winter used to back up quite a bit. These days, despite changes in the procedures at the Sheriff's office that allow for less time spent by the officers enforcing evictions, evictions take six to eight weeks in the good times and ten or eleven weeks during the winter.

Worse yet, the Sheriff's office has procedures in place to assist the elderly, disabled, and people with children with their move out. This sounds good in theory, but in practice, it adds a great deal of time to the process. There are bad apples out there among the ranks of both Landlords and Tenants, however, a Landlord with a mortgage can't afford to wait as long as it currently takes to get their tenants out.

Relief for Tenants when Landlord is Being Foreclosed

Effective January 1, 2008, the State of Illinois has enacted Public Act 095-0262 amending 735 ILCS 5/15-1701 of the Code of Civil Procedure to allow tenants a right of possession during a foreclosure. Under the old law, tenants could be evicted shortly after the entry of an order for possession in the foreclosure action.

Under the new law, in the case of a foreclosure where a tenant is current on his or her rent, an order for possession entered in a supplemental petition for possession in the foreclosure must allow the tenant to retain possession of the property covered by the tenant's rental agreement for the shorter of: (1) 120 days following the notice of the hearing that has been properly served upon the tenant or (2) through the duration of the tenant's lease.

As a result, tenants will have at least the balance of their lease if less than 4 months remain or up to 4 months after they receive notice that their landlord is in foreclosure. Tenants will still have to pay their rent. The law provides the additional right to possession only if the tenant continues to pay rent in full during the 120 day period. In addition, the right only extends to a case of "foreclosure where the tenant is current on his or her rent". This can lead to a few questions.

Who is entitled to rent during the pendancy of the foreclosure action? Is it the landlord, the mortgage holder foreclosing the loan, or the court appointed receiver? Generally, payment should be made to the landlord. However, many landlords in arrears refuse to accept rental payments. In such a case, the tenant should be careful to tender the rent payment to the landlord. If the payment is denied, the tenant should tender the rent payment to the court appointed receiver and/or mortgage holder. In either case, the tenant should get a receipt for payment! If neither the court appointed receiver/mortgage holder or the landlord will accept the rent, the tenant should appear in court and attmept to have the court order one of the parties to the suit to accept the rent.