The City of Chicago City Comptroller, Steven J. Lux, has released the security deposit interest rate for the coming year. The rate is determined by the City Comptroller based upon the average rates of interest as of 12-31-10 of a number of types of Chase Bank accounts.
The rate to be applied pursuant to 5-12-080 of the Chicago Residential Landlord Tenant Ordinance for leases governed by the periods from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011 is 0.073 percent.
I will publish the State of Illinois rate as soon as I learn it. Keep in mind, last year the State of Illinois rate was higher than the City of Chicago rate, so landlords governed by both the City of Chicago and State of Illinois law should have used the State of Illinois rate.
Showing posts with label CRLTO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CRLTO. Show all posts
Monday, January 3, 2011
Thursday, February 18, 2010
Looking for a Speaker?
In the last month or so, I have developed a pretty darn good (if I say so myself) presentation on the plethora of laws (local, state, and federal) affecting Chicago landlords when making a lease. I've presented the seminar to a group of ReMax agents and their clients and will be presenting again next week for Real Living Helios. I would be happy to make that same presentation to any interested landlord groups, real estate brokers or their clients. Anyone who is interested can feel free to contact me at http://illinois-attorney.com/contact.
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Horizon Realty and the Twitter case
Wow. PR nightmare. I do not know the people at Horizon Realty, but they really have dug a hole over their comment that "We're a sue first, ask questions later kind of an organization" in response to the twitter comments of former tenant Amanda Bonnen. Clarifying their position that the comment was "tongue in cheek" in a written statement later in the day, Horizon also indicated that they are embroiled in a CRLTO dispute with their former tenant. I would hate to be the defendant in that case if the Plaintiff tenant was able to get the case to a jury trial.
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Phonecall of the day!
I just fielded a phonecall from someone who found me on the web wondering "is it okay to take the hinges off of my tenant's door so that they just leave"? Apparently, the caller had already served the tenant with a five day notice and was now ready to engage in self help.
After I gathered my senses at such a question, I quickly remembered that this is exactly the reason why the landlord tenant laws have been slanted so far in favor of tenants. Just to be clear, because it seems to not be obvious to some landlords, there are only two people who can return a rental property to the landlord: (1) the tenant... voluntarily and (2) the sheriff after the landlord has obtained an order for possession from a judge. Other than those two scenarios, changing the locks, removing the door, cutting the electricity, moving someone else in, and any other nonsense that the landlord can think up is a wrongful eviction.
Landlords need to treat their rental business like what it is: a business. That means learning the rules and understanding how to move within the system. That means having a lease that complies with the CRLTO or other applicable laws (depending upon the location of the property).
Evictions cost lots of time and money. Lawsuits from tenants cost money. In these tougher economic times, landlord's can't afford to not do it by the book. They also need to build into their business plan the potential cost of an eviction and the cost of being in compliance with the law.
The Illinois forcible entry and detainer act provides that a tenant who is wrongfully or constructively evicted is entitled to an abatement of rent for the eviction period and also entitled to compensatory damages for any losses that were a result of the wrongful act. It is worse in Chicago. Under 5-12-160 of the CRLTO, a landlord is subject to a daily fine of between $200-$500 plus the tenant has a civil remedy to recover the greater of two months rent or twice the tenants actual damages plus court costs and attorney's fees. Landlords: don't lock out your tenants.
After I gathered my senses at such a question, I quickly remembered that this is exactly the reason why the landlord tenant laws have been slanted so far in favor of tenants. Just to be clear, because it seems to not be obvious to some landlords, there are only two people who can return a rental property to the landlord: (1) the tenant... voluntarily and (2) the sheriff after the landlord has obtained an order for possession from a judge. Other than those two scenarios, changing the locks, removing the door, cutting the electricity, moving someone else in, and any other nonsense that the landlord can think up is a wrongful eviction.
Landlords need to treat their rental business like what it is: a business. That means learning the rules and understanding how to move within the system. That means having a lease that complies with the CRLTO or other applicable laws (depending upon the location of the property).
Evictions cost lots of time and money. Lawsuits from tenants cost money. In these tougher economic times, landlord's can't afford to not do it by the book. They also need to build into their business plan the potential cost of an eviction and the cost of being in compliance with the law.
The Illinois forcible entry and detainer act provides that a tenant who is wrongfully or constructively evicted is entitled to an abatement of rent for the eviction period and also entitled to compensatory damages for any losses that were a result of the wrongful act. It is worse in Chicago. Under 5-12-160 of the CRLTO, a landlord is subject to a daily fine of between $200-$500 plus the tenant has a civil remedy to recover the greater of two months rent or twice the tenants actual damages plus court costs and attorney's fees. Landlords: don't lock out your tenants.
Friday, January 25, 2008
Exclusions from CRLTO
The City of Chicago Residential Landlord Tenant Ordinance strictly governs the conduct of most landlords within the City of Chicago. Nearly all rental property within the City limits is regulated by the CRLTO. Some rental units, however, are not covered by the strictures of the Ordinance.
In fact, Section 5-12-010 provides in part that the CRLTO "...applies to, regulates and determines rights. obligations and remedies under every rental agreement entered into or to be performed after the effective date of is chapter for a dwelling unit located within the City of Chicago, regardless of where the unit is made, subject only to the limitations contained in Section 5-12-020".
Section 5-12-020 of the Chicago Residential Landlord Tenant Ordinance sets forth the various exclusions from coverage of the ordinance. The most common exclusion from coverage arises under 5-12-020(a) of the CRLTO in situations where a building both (1) contains six or fewer units and (2) the landlord resides in the building. Even when the ordinance does not apply in the case of owner occupied buildings of six units or less, the provisions of Section 5-12-160 continue to apply.
Unfortunately for many condominium owners throughout the City of Chicago, the test for exclusion under 5-12-020(a) is a two part test. As a result, if a condominium owner owns a single unit in a four unit condominium building but does not also reside in the building, that condominium is governed by the CRLTO. Similarly, a single family home in the City of Chicago that is leased out is also governed by the CRLTO. Many landlords are surprised to find that their tenancies are governed by the ordinance. Usually, when they find out, it is too late.
The remainder of the exclusions in 5-12-020(b)-(f) provide for exemptions for various hotels, hospitals, purchasers of real estate who allow a seller to retain temporary possession, employee housing, and co-op property occupied by the co-op shareholder under the proprietary lease. The exclusions are quite limited and specific, with many being defined elsewhere in the City of Chicago code.
In fact, Section 5-12-010 provides in part that the CRLTO "...applies to, regulates and determines rights. obligations and remedies under every rental agreement entered into or to be performed after the effective date of is chapter for a dwelling unit located within the City of Chicago, regardless of where the unit is made, subject only to the limitations contained in Section 5-12-020".
Section 5-12-020 of the Chicago Residential Landlord Tenant Ordinance sets forth the various exclusions from coverage of the ordinance. The most common exclusion from coverage arises under 5-12-020(a) of the CRLTO in situations where a building both (1) contains six or fewer units and (2) the landlord resides in the building. Even when the ordinance does not apply in the case of owner occupied buildings of six units or less, the provisions of Section 5-12-160 continue to apply.
Unfortunately for many condominium owners throughout the City of Chicago, the test for exclusion under 5-12-020(a) is a two part test. As a result, if a condominium owner owns a single unit in a four unit condominium building but does not also reside in the building, that condominium is governed by the CRLTO. Similarly, a single family home in the City of Chicago that is leased out is also governed by the CRLTO. Many landlords are surprised to find that their tenancies are governed by the ordinance. Usually, when they find out, it is too late.
The remainder of the exclusions in 5-12-020(b)-(f) provide for exemptions for various hotels, hospitals, purchasers of real estate who allow a seller to retain temporary possession, employee housing, and co-op property occupied by the co-op shareholder under the proprietary lease. The exclusions are quite limited and specific, with many being defined elsewhere in the City of Chicago code.
Wednesday, July 18, 2007
Ever hear of the Chicago Residential Landlord Tenant Ordinance?
These days, I am finding more and more work related to the Chicago Residential Landlord Tenant Ordinance (CRLTO) from landlords who have run afoul of the provisions of the Ordinance without knowing that the ordinance exists!
Nearly all of these landlords have called me for reasons not related to their own issues with the ordinance. Instead, these issues are discovered during the course of discussions about tenant evictions, lease reviews or other "bad tenant" related issues and worse yet, when the issue comes up in regard to a real estate transaction!
Most of the folks I speak with are disappointed (and sometimes disbelieving) when I begin to explain the ordinance requirements and the penalties for failure to comply to them. The CRLTO governs most residential real estate tenancies in the City of Chicago (there are a few exceptions to the ordinance, but nearly all landlords must abide by the provisions). The ordinance supercedes any common law of Illinois and any terms of a lease or other agreement between the parties. The CRLTO governs all sorts of issues related to the landlord tenant relationship, from the proper care and feeding of security deposits to invalid, illegal or unenforceable lease terms all the way to the obligation of the landlord to make himself or herself known to a tenant. The penalties for violation of the CRLTO are severe.
After I inform a client of the serious repercussions of violating the CRLTO and, usually, a moment of silence and disbelief, the landlord asks me if I am serious. Unfortunately, I am. The CRLTO exists, it is real, it is slanted in favor of the tenant and Landlords need to comply with it. This has been confirmed time and again by the appellate courts and the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois.
While I don't want to discuss the merits of the CRLTO here, I do think that attorneys need to do a better job informing clients of the obligations under the CRLTO and landlords need to do a better job complying.
I will be writing in this blog regularly about the ordinance, its penalties and how landlords can better comply. I will also lobby herein for some reasonable amendments necessary to make the ordinance more "workable".
Nearly all of these landlords have called me for reasons not related to their own issues with the ordinance. Instead, these issues are discovered during the course of discussions about tenant evictions, lease reviews or other "bad tenant" related issues and worse yet, when the issue comes up in regard to a real estate transaction!
Most of the folks I speak with are disappointed (and sometimes disbelieving) when I begin to explain the ordinance requirements and the penalties for failure to comply to them. The CRLTO governs most residential real estate tenancies in the City of Chicago (there are a few exceptions to the ordinance, but nearly all landlords must abide by the provisions). The ordinance supercedes any common law of Illinois and any terms of a lease or other agreement between the parties. The CRLTO governs all sorts of issues related to the landlord tenant relationship, from the proper care and feeding of security deposits to invalid, illegal or unenforceable lease terms all the way to the obligation of the landlord to make himself or herself known to a tenant. The penalties for violation of the CRLTO are severe.
After I inform a client of the serious repercussions of violating the CRLTO and, usually, a moment of silence and disbelief, the landlord asks me if I am serious. Unfortunately, I am. The CRLTO exists, it is real, it is slanted in favor of the tenant and Landlords need to comply with it. This has been confirmed time and again by the appellate courts and the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois.
While I don't want to discuss the merits of the CRLTO here, I do think that attorneys need to do a better job informing clients of the obligations under the CRLTO and landlords need to do a better job complying.
I will be writing in this blog regularly about the ordinance, its penalties and how landlords can better comply. I will also lobby herein for some reasonable amendments necessary to make the ordinance more "workable".
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)